The Supreme Court allowed President Trump to restart mass layoffs at the U.S. Education Department, impacting nearly 1,400 employees. In a 6-3 decision, the conservative majority lifted a lower courts order that had blocked the firings and required worker reinstatements.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon called the ruling a significant win, enabling her to advance Trumps executive order to close the department to the maximum extent permitted by law.

The layoffs, affecting one-third of the agencys workforce, are part of Trumps broader push to shrink federal government roles and return education oversight to states.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor led a fiery dissent, joined by liberal justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. She accused the majority of enabling lawlessness, writing that Trumps plan usurps Congresss power by effectively abolishing a congressionally created agency.

Sotomayor warned the cuts would unleash untold harm, crippling enforcement of civil rights laws, support for disabled students, and anti-discrimination efforts.

The dissent highlighted Trumps public vow to eliminate the departmentevidence that the administration aimed to break the law.

Twenty-one Democratic states and teachers' unions sued, arguing the layoffs would paralyze critical programs. They cited risks to $1.6 trillion in student loans, special education services, and aid for low-income schoolsall congressionally mandated duties.

Massachusetts districts warned of irreversible damage, like delayed financial aid that could force teacher layoffs.

Employees, on paid leave since March, now face termination. A union representative lamented, This guts our capacity to protect students.

This ruling follows last weeks Supreme Court approval of Trumps federal workforce reductions, cementing his campaign promise to dismantle the administrative state.

The Education Departments closure plan includes transferring student loans to the Small Business Administration and disability programs to Health and Human Services.

Legal challenges continue in lower courts, but the administration can now proceed during appeals. Critics fear similar targets for USAID and diversity programs under Trumps Department of Government Efficiency.