Link
Link
Amy Harris
Clark County Matters
The past two years, weve repeatedly warned that Vancouver doesnt have to end up like Portland, losing quality of life to homelessness and lawlessness. The policy failures of our neighbor across the river, actually provide a real-life laboratory for what policy makers in Vancouver and Clark County should AVOID doing.
Amy Harris
Clark County Matters
But instead of learning from the mistakes of Portland, Vancouver city officials are committed to repeating them. Before I share more details, consider these three tragic facts of the Portland homeless record as reported by ProPublica on June 11:
- $1.3 BILLION
Portland allocated $1.3 Billion from 2021 to 2024 to reprioritize public health and safety among homeless Portlanders.
- $200,000
Over that time, the city spent roughly $200,000 per homeless resident. - 450+
Yet deaths quadrupled, climbing from 113 deaths in 2019 to more than 450 in 2023.
Earlier this year, the city of Vancouver awarded a contract to Do Good Multnomah to operate a new homeless shelter. On paper, the organization may sound appealing, it promotes a low-barrier, housing-first approach and has partnered with neighboring Multnomah County. But theres a serious problem: Do Good Multnomah has a documented track record of failure.
Youve probably never heard any of this because our local media outlet The Columbian is more interested in protecting the failing status quo than asking tough questions about the massive increases in public funding going into local homeless programs and providers while the problem continues to grow worse.
Consider just one example: Sandy Studios, a supportive housing site the organization managed in Portland. A 2023 audit from Multnomah County revealed alarming mismanagement, lack of oversight, and unsafe living conditions that culminated in a ceiling collapse.
Do Good Multnomah subcontracted building maintenance to Home First Development a firm with no property maintenance experience without a competitive process or formal approval. What followed was neglect and decay. The site suffered from faulty wiring, broken plumbing, mold, inaccessible wheelchair ramps, and even a hole in the basement floor. Staff described the building as moldering into the ground. Meanwhile, tenants were allowed to deny access to maintenance crews, even when serious repairs were needed.
Despite obvious problems, the Joint Office of Homeless Services (JOHS) failed to inspect the site or intervene. Rent payments continued. Quarterly reports from Do Good were vague, repetitive, and omitted major safety concerns. No action was taken until a ceiling finally collapsed in 2021.
The auditors conclusion was clear: there were failures at every level. The report recommended stronger contract enforcement, clearer oversight roles, and improved compliance tracking.
Given this record of failure, why would the city of Vancouver hire Do Good Multnomah? Thats a question the City Council needs to answer.
The most generous explanation might be that city leaders didnt fully investigate Do Goods record. But these werent isolated missteps they were systemic, well-documented failures. Vancouvers leadership should have known.
Its possible the city chose Do Good because its housing-first, low-barrier philosophy aligns with prevailing political priorities. But values are not enough. Effectiveness matters. Accountability matters. In fact, it matters most, especially when lives and public safety are on the line.
Vancouver residents have been clear: they want action on public camping and homelessness. They want real results, not ideological spouts that leave neighborhoods at risk and people on the streets. Choosing a provider with a failed track record sends the wrong message.
We all want solutions rooted in compassion. But compassion without competence doesnt help anyone. Good intentions alone cant solve complex problems. True progress requires not only empathy for those in need but also the expertise, accountability, and effective management to deliver real, sustainable solutions. Without that balance, efforts risk falling short, leaving vulnerable people underserved and communities frustrated.
Vancouver had the opportunity to choose a different path. Instead, were risking the same costly mistakes that have plagued Portland for years. City officials owe residents an explanation why this contract was awarded, and what steps theyre taking to ensure Vancouver doesnt repeat the same failures Multnomah County is still trying to fix.
