Why Men Are Actually Good at Gossiping: Debunking the Stereotypes

What does it mean to be good at gossip?

A good gossip doesnt just tell you that Sally broke up with Joe, they tell you that Sally broke up with Joe just a week after posting a bunch of (now deleted) romantic international vacation pics to Instagram. They dont simply say Brittanys a bad coworker, they tell you that no one at the office likes Britt because she microwaves her asparagus-heavy meal preps. They dont mention that Mary is having a tough time with her sister-in-law and then drop it, they explain that her brothers wife is a Disney adult who arranged for the entire family to spend their next Thanksgiving at Epcot and already sent out Venmo requests for a couple thousand dollars worth of Mickey Mouse breakfasts.

According to stereotype, this is a skill men particularly straight men just dont have.

Their supposed inability to spin a good yarn has been a point of internet mockery, with memes and gags usually coming from the women in their lives who are forced to parse through the driest, most unsatisfying stories ever told. Like a hungry person fighting their way through a well-done steak, these tea-seekers must suffer to find a semblance of sustenance.

Its hard not to laugh at the tension these skits and jokes highlight between the person wanting the entire story and the person giving them absolutely nothing. But underneath the comedy are deeper questions about the ethics, the stigma, and the history of gossip, especially who gets to participate. The way that the women who poke fun at their partners reticence online seek (and are denied) connection speaks to larger concerns. What does dudes inability to share secrets especially with other bros mean for the much-discussed loneliness crisis among men?

When people say that men are bad at gossiping, it might come with the assumption that men dont gossip. They cant be good at it, because they dont or only rarely partake. But that train of thought is built on a fallacy.

That fallacy begins with how we define gossip. For a long time, its had a negative connotation, the act of talking poorly about someone behind their back. But more and more recently, researchers and social scientists like Megan Robbins have begun reassessing the term, broadening it to define all the ways we talk about other people, good, bad, and neutral.

Robbins and her team conducted a 2019 study that examined the rates at which men and women gossip and if men and women had any differences when it comes to positive (e.g., John bought a pair of nice shoes!), negative (John bought a pair of ugly shoes!) and neutral (John bought a pair of shoes.). They found that men and women gossip positively and negatively at similar rates, but that women gossip neutrally more than men.

It really corresponds with past evidence that women talk more about social topics than men, Robbins, an associate professor in psychology at the University of California Riverside, says. So theres this practice element to talking about social topics, talking about people, even just in a neutral way, and men are just not doing it as much in the evidence that we have.

Robbinss study helps explain a few things. It debunks the trope that women are more inclined to disparage someone, and, at the same time, explains why people may perceive that women are better at gossiping or sharing information if theyre gossiping neutrally at a higher rate, so they have more practice. The project also shows that despite the stereotypes, men do gossip, positively and negatively.

More than that, men enjoy gossip, even (and especially) when theyre at the center of it. A 2025 study from professor Andrew Hales and his research team found that men, more than women, were consistently more open to being talked about.

I mean it, maybe its as simple as men just like attention, Hales, who teaches at the University of Mississippi, tells me. Haless study focused on the targets of gossip, setting up a theoretical scenario in which a person leaves a party and then is asked whether they want the people who stayed to talk about them. Hales and his team found that people who were male and/or narcissistic were the most likely to want to be spoken about, even if the gossip was going to be negative.

If you were to control for narcissism, men still are more comfortable being talked about than women are so its not just that men are more narcissistic, although they are, Hales says, noting that the findings contradicted the popular ideas about how men dont enjoy gossip nor particularly like being the targets of it.

The population who have been thought to like gossip the least, actually enjoy its existence as much, if not more, than everyone else. But if thats the case, why are they notoriously awful at it?

Comedian and podcaster Jared Freid intuitively believes what Robbinss study proves: that uninspired male gossips just havent put in the work, like weight lifters who regularly skip leg day.

I just dont think theres as many reps for men hearing a crazy story, and theres a lot more reps for women, Freid, a man, tells me. Were just not trained, you know?

Freid primarily attributes mens unskillful gossip to a lack of cultural opportunities to yap freely. He sees things like weekend brunches, group chats, and the ample discussion fodder provided by Bravos various reality shows as opportunities that mostly women have to sharpen their storytelling tools and observe how drama works firsthand. These conversations teach a person how to gab and, perhaps more importantly, how to respond to spicy information. Gossip is a two-way street; a question or quip can enrich the entire tale.

Straight men, he says, dont have an equivalent.

While men do hang out, it never gets too chatty. Freid explains that gossip feels messy and, even something as simple as being curious about a story or a rumor could be construed as stirring the pot (men, he says, do not want to be seen as pot-stirrers). Its not that straight men are inherently bad at gossip, its that they wont allow themselves to openly partake in or enjoy it.

I dont think guys are really allowed to be messy and still have social credibility, Freid says.

Kelsey McKinney, the author of You Didnt Hear This From Me: (Mostly) True Notes on Gossip and the founding host of the Normal Gossip podcast, sees this fear from men, too. Straight men seem to have the perception that gossip isnt talking about other people, McKinney says. Gossip, to them, is a tone of voice that they avoid at all costs.

This attitude grows out from a misogynistic idea that gossip is a negative thing that women do, something Robbins, the social scientist, considered during her research.

Theres a stereotype that women [negatively] gossip more than men, but there hasnt been a whole lot of evidence for that, Robbins tells Vox. And I feel like having the stereotype that women gossip more than men, you know, serves to keep them in their place, right?

Robbins believes that social skills are valuable, and being able to discuss social topics is a necessary piece of that puzzle. Yet historically, those abilities havent always been prized. Dismissing all social talk as gossip was a way to dismiss the women who possess those talents.

Now, so many men see gossip as unbecoming as well as unmanly, they dont allow themselves to really relish the juicy morsels, nor do they tease out the savory bits.

Curiously, Freid is the co-host of the Betches media-produced podcast U Up? Its a show devoted to decoding dating and relationships. His professional life revolves around piquing peoples interests and recounting peoples stories in hilarious ways. Does that mean the careers Freids chosen are at odds with his manhood?

I had to learn to be a better storyteller, Freid tells me. To do that? He talked to women; friends, his co-host, his coworkers at Betches. A lot of women.

Okay, so men might be less adept at gossip. Do they really need to be good at it?

As Robbins indicated, continuing research shows that gossip can be a helpful social tool. Talking about other people isnt just not all bad, it can be actively good. McKinney says that social scientists and psychologists have been reassessing the tropes, narratives, and stigma surrounding gossip and gossipers, and theyve found that gossip brings people closer together. The idea is that the individual piece of gossip is less important than the bond thats forged when someone shares information with another person.

Maybe the true measure of a friendship is the Can I be a bitch for a second? texts we sent along the way.

We share stories with people we think we are close to, and sharing things with other people creates intimacy. The gossip we share, arguably, is as much about our own values and beliefs and dislikes as it is about other people.

At the same time, over the past half-decade or so, much has been made of whats known as the male loneliness epidemic the idea that men are lonelier than ever and that their friendships are dwindling.

If intimacy is defined, in part, by the idea of sharing stories with one another, its not that difficult to see men who are bad at gossip hit with a lose-lose situation. They dont have the close friendships that facilitate gossip and the bond-building that comes with it, and they dont get good enough at gossip to initiate the bond-building. Thats a problem, because men are disadvantaged when it comes to intimacy and communication from an early age.

Research shows that by the time little boys are 3, we talk to them less and touch them less, Alexandra Solomon, a relationship psychologist at Northwestern University, tells me. Solomon says that fewer conversations and less physical affection in childhood have long-lasting social effects.

As boys grow up, many will tend to see communication as transactional, or directive, or a means to solving problems instead of an avenue that builds relationships. Those men see the sharing of gossip and storytelling in general as uncomfortable or a taboo, instead of intimately sharing and engaging with a story.

I really think theres a male fear of incriminating yourself.

I really think theres a male fear of incriminating yourself, Freid, the comedian and man, tells me. I dont hear someone telling me their story and go, Oh, good. I can tell them all my stories.

Freid says he sees male friendships and female friendships as fundamentally different, echoing Solomons explanation of the divergent ideas about communication. Female friendships, he says, involves a give-and-go, a trading of shoulders to cry on. That trading allows for deeper friendships among women but, he suspects, also opens the door for potential rifts when someone doesnt hold up their end of the bargain. Fried takes some comfort in the idea that he never has to worry about hypothetically disappointing his buddies.

I just have no friends where Id be like, I cant believe they havent called recently, he says.

Its not too hard, though, to link not expecting anyone to check in with a larger, existential problem with loneliness. Is that lack of expectation worth the lack of support? If Saturdays are proverbially for the boys, why not mix in some yapping? If straight men (statistically) gossip anyway, is there real harm in openly enjoying it, seeking it out, using it to build connections? As easy as that seems, its asking men to share things about themselves in ways that go against how theyve been conditioned.

I would actually be out of a job if men could do that, Solomon, the psychologist at Northwestern, tells me. If the trade-off is not having a career, but men talked and shared more? I would do it.

Not to tell tales out of school, but from what Ive heard, Solomons job security isnt in danger.

• Culture
• Even Better
• Life
• The Vox Guide to Love and Relationships